Legal Opinion

Elliott v. Dorius

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1976No. 14388PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court affirming a prior administrative action of revoking his driving privilege for his refusal to submit to a chemical test under the implied consent law, 41 — 6— 44.10. The trial court determined there was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest; a proper request for a chemical test was *761made by the arresting officer; and plaintiff refused to take a chemical test, as requested and designated by the officer, without justification. We affirm. All statutory references are to U.C.A.1953, as amended.

The record shows plaintiff was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Gassman v. DoriusUtah Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. DischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
  2. In Matter of Suspension of Operating Privilege of BardwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Wirz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Fugere v. State, Taxation & Revenue Department, Motor Vehicle DivisionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. Salt Lake City v. WomackUtah Supreme Court · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API