Elliott v. Dorius
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court affirming a prior administrative action of revoking his driving privilege for his refusal to submit to a chemical test under the implied consent law, 41 — 6— 44.10. The trial court determined there was probable cause for plaintiff’s arrest; a proper request for a chemical test was *761made by the arresting officer; and plaintiff refused to take a chemical test, as requested and designated by the officer, without justification. We affirm. All statutory references are to U.C.A.1953, as amended.
The record shows plaintiff was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Gassman v. DoriusUtah Supreme Court · 1975
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. DischWisconsin Supreme Court · 1984
- In Matter of Suspension of Operating Privilege of BardwellWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
- Wirz v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Fugere v. State, Taxation & Revenue Department, Motor Vehicle DivisionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Salt Lake City v. WomackUtah Supreme Court · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.