Legal Opinion

Gibb v. Dorius

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1975No. 13626PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAUGHAN, Justice:

Here on appeal is a matter having its genesis in the arrest of plaintiff on a charge of driving under the influence of alcohol. The upshot of an alleged refusal of plaintiff to submit to a blood test was an appeal to the district court, from the decision of the trial examiner, revoking plaintiff’s driver’s license.

Upon the appeal of the trial examiner’s ruling, the trial court found that the State had not provided a “duly authorized laboratory technician” to withdraw blood from plaintiff for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content therein. For that reason, the trial…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Howarth v. OstergaardUtah Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Maw v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 1945
  3. General Talking Pictures Corporation v. HyattUtah Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Celebrity Club, Inc. v. Utah Liquor Control CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Gassman v. DoriusUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State v. DurrantUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. In re Suspension of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
  5. Celebrity Club, Inc. v. Utah Liquor Control CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API