Gibb v. Dorius
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
MAUGHAN, Justice:
Here on appeal is a matter having its genesis in the arrest of plaintiff on a charge of driving under the influence of alcohol. The upshot of an alleged refusal of plaintiff to submit to a blood test was an appeal to the district court, from the decision of the trial examiner, revoking plaintiff’s driver’s license.
Upon the appeal of the trial examiner’s ruling, the trial court found that the State had not provided a “duly authorized laboratory technician” to withdraw blood from plaintiff for the purpose of determining the alcoholic content therein. For that reason, the trial…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Howarth v. OstergaardUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- Maw v. LeeUtah Supreme Court · 1945
- General Talking Pictures Corporation v. HyattUtah Supreme Court · 1948
3Cited by11 opinions
- Celebrity Club, Inc. v. Utah Liquor Control CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- Gassman v. DoriusUtah Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. DurrantUtah Supreme Court · 1977
- In re Suspension of License to Operate a Motor Vehicle of RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1989
- Celebrity Club, Inc. v. Utah Liquor Control CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.