Legal Opinion

Ringwood v. State

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1959No. 8858PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice.

Harold T. Ring wood seeks to compel reinstatement of his driver’s license, which the defendant revoked. The revocation was based upon the 1957 statute 1 which provides for the chemical testing of the breath, blood, urine or saliva of persons arrested under suspicion of driving while intoxicated. The trial court ruled for the plaintiff, from which the defendant appeals. Affirmed.

The pertinent portions of the statute are:

“(a) Any person who operates a motor vehicle in this state shall be deemed to have given his consent to a chemical test of- his breath, blood, urine or saliva…

2Cited by23 opinions

  1. Gottschalk v. SueppelSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
  2. State v. TurnerTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Matter of GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
  4. State v. TappUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  5. Intermountain Smelting Corp. v. CapitanoUtah Supreme Court · 1980

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API