Legal Opinion

Beck v. Cox

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1979No. 15795PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEWART, Justice:

Plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court revoking his driver’s license pursuant to Utah’s Implied Consent Statute, Section 41-6-44.10, U.C.A.1 Plaintiff raises the important issue under that statute of what conduct constitutes a “refusal” to take a blood test so as to warrant the revocation of the license of a person arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or a drug.

The legislature has provided for the revocation of a driver’s license of a person who refuses to take a blood alcohol test at the request of a police officer. Section 41-6-44.10(a)…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
  3. Hoban v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Buda v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  2. Holman v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
  3. State v. ReitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Conrad v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Village of Elkhart Lake v. BorzyskowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API