Beck v. Cox
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Justice:
Plaintiff appeals from an order of the district court revoking his driver’s license pursuant to Utah’s Implied Consent Statute, Section 41-6-44.10, U.C.A.1 Plaintiff raises the important issue under that statute of what conduct constitutes a “refusal” to take a blood test so as to warrant the revocation of the license of a person arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol or a drug.
The legislature has provided for the revocation of a driver’s license of a person who refuses to take a blood alcohol test at the request of a police officer. Section 41-6-44.10(a)…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Campbell v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Spradling v. DeimekeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1975
- Hoban v. RiceOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- Charlton v. HackettUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Buda v. FultonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Gaunt v. Motor Vehicle Div., Dept. of Transp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Holman v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. ReitterWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- Conrad v. SchwendimanUtah Supreme Court · 1984
- Village of Elkhart Lake v. BorzyskowskiCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.