Underwood Veneer Co. v. Lucia
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.
It will not be necessary to set out the entire contract of May 11, 1928. By the terms of it' Rolo & Son were to cut about twenty-five million feet of merchantable saw-log timber upon certain described .premises, five million feet to be logged during the logging season of 1928-29. The contract then provided specifications for cutting, grading, place of delivery, decking, and the amount to b.e paid by the plaintiff for the logs delivered according to the contract. Rolo & Son were the parties of the first *510part and the plaintiff was the party of the second part. The contract then provided:
“Due to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Manufacturers' Bank of Milwaukee v. RugeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
- Haynes v. LeppigMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
- Anderson v. BrennemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- Glidden v. NorvellMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
- George Walter Brewing Co. v. LockeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1907
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carpenter v. ForbesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
- C. I. T. Corp. v. WallermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
- National Bank of Commerce of Milwaukee v. BroganWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934