Legal Opinion

Manufacturers' Bank of Milwaukee v. Rugee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided January 8, 1884PublishedCited by 17 opinions

APPEAL from the Circuit Court for Milwajukee County. Eeplevin. The facts are stated in the opinion. The cause was tried by the court, a jury having been waived. From a judgment in favor of the plaintiff the defendánt appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtOrton, J.

This is an action of- replevin, and the goods were taken on the writ. The complaint alleges that the plaintiff was the owner and entitled to the possession thereof, and that the defendant wrongfully took and wrongfully detains the same. The answer denies that the plaintiff was or is the owner, or entitled to the possession, of the property, and denies that he wrongfully took or wrongfully detains the *222same. The answer further admits .the taking and detention of the property, and justifies the same, alleging that the defendant did so, as sheriff of Milwaukee county, by virtue of a writ of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Rockwell v. HumphreyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Hodges v. . the Tennessee Marine and Fire Insurance CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  3. Grant v. LewisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  4. Menzies v. DoddWisconsin Supreme Court · 1865

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Antigo Screen Door Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1903
  2. Gross v. HeckertWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Smith v. PflugerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. First National Bank of Madison v. DammWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. George Hess v. Sam Paulo, Sr.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1949

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API