Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Brenneman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1880PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Marquette. Trespass on the case. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMarston, C. J.

Some of the questions discussed we think do not fairly arise upon this record. The action is brought against the sheriff for releasing a quantity of iron levied upon by him by virtue of certain executions in favor of the plaintiffs against the Marquette & Pacific Polling Mill Company.

The controversy is narrowed down to 30-| tons, which the sheriff claims was the property of Sylvester T. Everett under a contract with the company dated August 1st, 1877. Ten and a half tons of this iron was made previous to the date of the contract with Everett, and although sought to be applied thereon…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Merchants' & Manufacturers' Bank v. HibbardMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Talcott v. CrippenMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Lee Wilson & Co. v. Crittenden County Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1911
  4. Commercial National Bank v. GilletteIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  5. Anderson v. CourtneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API