Legal Opinion

Carpenter v. Forbes

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1933PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed April 11, 1933 :

Fritz, J.

The question presented is whether the plaintiff, by virtue of his garnishee process, is, as a judgment creditor of Orrin C. Forbes and Mabel Forbes, entitled to the proceeds of an auction sale of personal property of the judgment debtors; or whether F. M. Allen and Sam Forbes, who were interpleaded in the garnishment proceedings, are entitled to those proceeds, as was held by the trial court. There is no dispute as to the facts essential to the determination of this appeal. On and prior to January 5, 1932, Orrin C. Forbes owed Ida O.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Crook v. First National Bank of BarabooWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Hoyt v. ClemansSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Minneapolis Threshing Machine Co. v. CalhounSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  4. First National Bank of Madison v. DammWisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Caroline State Bank v. AndrewsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Middleton Lumber & Fuel Co. v. KosankeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  2. C. I. T. Corp. v. WallermanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Kramer v. BurlageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Burnett County Abstract Co. v. Eau Claire Citizens Loan & Investment Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Chapman v. Allen TrusteesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API