Glidden v. Norvell
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Baraga. Bill to enforce a lien on ore, and to enjoin defendant from mingling other ores with that on which the lien was placed, and from selling it. Dismissed on demurrer. Com- ' plainants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
In the court of chancery a general demurrer to the bill of complaint in this cause was sustained and the *204bill dismissed. "Whether equities are shown by- the bill is therefore the only question here.
The complainants are partners in business at Cleveland, Ohio, under the firm name of Glidden & Eells. The bill alleges that during the year 1877 they made large advances to the Spur "Mountain Iron Mining Company, a corporation doing business in the county of Baraga, and said company was on the 19th day of December, 1877, indebted to complainanants in
“ the sum of $24,000, as near as may be; that for…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Regents of the University of Michigan v. Detroit Young Men's SocietyMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
- Hoffman v. RossMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
3Cited by8 opinions
- Gillen v. Wakefield State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1929
- Wilmarth v. WoodcockMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
- Robinson v. KunklemanMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Greenley v. HoveyMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
- First National Bank v. SummersMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.