United States v. Martin Schwimmer
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:
The principal issue on this appeal is whether a defendant who has been tried, convicted, and whose appeal is pending may be granted use immunity and then be compelled to testify before a grand jury, on matters that were the subject of his conviction, even though his appeal may result in a retrial of those offenses about which he gave compelled testimony. We believe the testimony of such a defendant may be compelled. Hence, we affirm.
I FACTS
Appellant Martin Schwimmer takes this expedited appeal from a March 14, 1989 order of confinement imposed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Richard Ray LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Donald Eugene Ryans D/B/A Ryans Moving & Storage and Westside MoversCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RajaratnamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.