Legal Opinion

United States v. Martin Schwimmer

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided August 1, 1989No. 1116, Docket 89-6048PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CARDAMONE, Circuit Judge:

The principal issue on this appeal is whether a defendant who has been tried, convicted, and whose appeal is pending may be granted use immunity and then be compelled to testify before a grand jury, on matters that were the subject of his conviction, even though his appeal may result in a retrial of those offenses about which he gave compelled testimony. We believe the testimony of such a defendant may be compelled. Hence, we affirm.

I FACTS

Appellant Martin Schwimmer takes this expedited appeal from a March 14, 1989 order of confinement imposed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Powell v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  3. United States v. CalandraSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Massiah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. Oliver L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Martin SchwimmerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Richard Ray LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
  4. United States v. Donald Eugene Ryans D/B/A Ryans Moving & Storage and Westside MoversCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Securities & Exchange Commission v. RajaratnamCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API