Legal Opinion
Securities & Exchange Commission v. Rajaratnam
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided September 29, 2010No. 18-2607PublishedCited by 58 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GERARD E. LYNCH, Circuit Judge:
Defendants-Appellants Raj Rajaratnam and Danielle Chiesi (hereinafter, “Appellants”) appeal from a district court (Jed S. Rakoff, Judge) discovery order compelling Appellants to disclose thousands of wiretapped conversations, originally provided to Appellants by the United States Attorney’s Office (“USAO”) in parallel criminal proceedings, to Plaintiff-Appellee Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) for use in this civil enforcement action against Appellants. We conclude that Title III of the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 (“Title III”),…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by58 opinions
- Outlaw v. City of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
- Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, New York, Inc. v. Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany, New York, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2014
- United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Fireman's Fund Insurance v. Great Am. InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Linde v. Arab Bank, PLCCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.