Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Ray Lacey

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided June 11, 1996No. 94-3317PublishedCited by 93 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EBEL, Circuit Judge.

Appellant Richard Ray Lacey (“Lacey”) appeals from his convictions and sentence on various drug-related offenses. On appeal, Lacey complains that: (1) the district court erred in not granting a downward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines based on the government’s alleged “sentencing factor manipulation”; (2) the court erroneously enhanced Lacey’s offense level based on his role in the offense; (3) the court abused its discretion in refusing to grant a mistrial based on improper statements made during voir dire; (4) the court erred in refusing to instruct the jury on…

2Cases cited73 opinions

  1. Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Irvin v. DowdSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Allen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by93 opinions

  1. Vega v. ZavarasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
  2. Dell v. StraubDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
  3. United States v. PerrineCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  4. State v. KellySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  5. United States v. McKissickCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API