Blevins v. New Holland North America, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
JONES, District Judge.
In this products liability action, both parties have moved in limine to exclude certain expert witness testimony to be presented at trial by the opposing party. In addition, the defendant manufacturer has moved in limine to exclude evidence of prior product accidents. The motions will be denied in part and granted in part.
I
The plaintiff in this case, Douglas M. Blevins, seeks damages because of injuries received by him in a farm accident involving a hay baler manufactured by the defendant, New Holland North America, Inc. (“New Holland”). The court…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Weisgram v. Marley Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Benedi v. McNeil-P.P.C., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- prod.liab.rep. (Cch) P 13,479 Theodore Alevromagiros v. Hechinger Company White Metal Rolling and Stamping Corporation of Atlanta, GaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Malcolm v. EVENFLO CO., INC.Montana Supreme Court · 2009
- Fairshter v. American National Red CrossDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2004
- Benedict v. Hankook Tire Co.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
- Tunnell v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, W.D. Virginia · 2004
- Jones v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2006
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.