Legal Opinion
Tunnell v. Ford Motor Co.
District Court, W.D. Virginia
Decided August 4, 2004No. CIV.A. 4:03CV00074PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MOON, District Judge.
Pursuant to the authority in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this matter was referred to The Honorable Michael F. Urbanski, United States Magistrate Judge, for proposed findings of fact, conclusions and recommendations for the disposition of: (i) certain motions filed by defendant Ford Motor Company (“Defendant”) to exclude the testimony of plaintiff John Witten Tun-nell’s (“Plaintiff’) expert witnesses Charles Crim (“Crim”), Samuel McKnight (“McKnight”), Marjorie Adams (“Adams”), Pamela Kiecker (“Kiecker”) and Jerry Wallingford (‘Wallingford”) and (ii)…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Keith v. VolpeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Harolds Stores, Inc. v. Dillard Department Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Oglesby v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Samuel Anstey v. David Ballard, WardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
- Perry Lumber Co. v. Durable Services, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2006
- Dodson v. Ford Motor Company, 96-1331 (2006)Superior Court of Rhode Island · 2006
- Hollenbeck v. TrikilisDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
- Samuel Anstey v. David Ballard, WardenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.