Legal Opinion
Duxbury v. Harding
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided September 16, 1992No. 17952PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SABERS, Justice.
Petitioners1 seek a permanent writ of prohibition to prevent Respondents from disbursing or allocating funds pursuant to certain appropriations contained in the 1992 General Appropriation Bill asserting that they were special appropriations requiring a two-thirds vote.
FACTS
This is a matter of original jurisdiction. S.D. Const, art. V, § 5; SDCL 15-25-1; SDCL 21-30-2. On June 12, 1992, this court granted Petitioners’ request for a temporary writ of prohibition. Petitioners challenge the following appropriations because they were part of the General Appropriation Bill which was…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State ex rel. Payne v. ReevesSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1921
- Humbert v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Independent Community Bankers Ass'n of South Dakota v. State Ex Rel. MeierhenrySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- Schomer v. ScottSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- State Ex Rel. Oster v. JorgensonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- South Dakota Education Association/ NEA Ex Rel. Roberts v. BarnettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Apa v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- In the Matter of the Interpretation of South Dakota Constitution and State Law Re: State Legislator's Interest in State or County ContractsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
- Apa v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Apa v. ButlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.