Legal Opinion
In the Matter of the Interpretation of South Dakota Constitution and State Law Re: State Legislator's Interest in State or County Contracts
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided February 9, 2024No. 30488PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
#30488
2024 S.D. 11
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA **** #30488 IN RE: THE REQUEST OF SOUTH DAKOTA GOVERNOR KRISTI NOEM FOR AN ADVISORY OPINION IN THE MATTER OF INTERPRETATION OF SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION AND STATE LAWS REGARDING STATE LEGISLATOR’S INTEREST IN STATE OR COUNTY CONTRACTS **** ORIGINAL PROCEEDING **** ARGUED JANUARY 8, 2024 OPINION FILED 02/09/24 #30488 AN OPINION REQUESTED BY HER EXCELLENCY, KRISTI NOEM, THE GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF SOUTH DAKOTA, PURSUANT TO ARTICLE V, § 5 OF THE SOUTH DAKOTA CONSTITUTION SALTER, Justice [¶1.] Citing Article V, § 5 of the South…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- McDonald v. City of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Ramos v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Earll v. Farmers Mutual InsuranceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025
- Advisory OpinionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
- Estate of Sanborn v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
- State v. WincklerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
- Estate of Sanborn v. PetersonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.