Legal Opinion

Loucks v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided December 3, 2004No. 91,488PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Malone, J.:

This is an underinsured motorist (UIM) insurance case. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. (Farm Bureau) appeals the judgment for damages and attorney fees in favor of its insured, Paul Loucks. The legislative purpose of mandating the offer of UIM coverage was to fill a gap inherent in motor vehicle financial responsibility legislation and compulsory insurance legislation. The coverage was intended to recompense innocent persons who are injured through the wrongful conduct of motorists who because they are not financially responsible cannot be made to respond in damages.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Gillespie v. SeymourSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Hamilton v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Brumley v. LeeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  4. Bracken v. Dixon Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2002
  5. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Unruh v. PURINA MILLS, LLCSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
  2. Bussman v. Safeco Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2014
  3. Williams v. SilvolaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Barlett v. CNACourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005
  5. Barlett v. CNACourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API