Legal Opinion

Liggatt v. Employers Mutual Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 31, 2002No. 87,005PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Davis, J.:

Passenger Janet Hathaway filed a tort action against driver Gale Liggatt for injuries she sustained in a one vehicle motorcycle accident. Liggatt’s insurer, Employers Mutual Casualty Company (EMC), denied coverage and refused to defend based upon a specific policy exclusion for a vehicle with less than four wheels. Hathaway’s garnishment action against EMC based upon a consent judgment arid Liggatt’s breach of contract action against EMC for attorney fees expended in defending Hathaway’s tort action both failed on summary judgment. The trial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Marquis v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Catholic Diocese of Dodge City v. RaymerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  3. Regional Bank of Colorado, N.A. v. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  4. First Financial Insurance v. BuggSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  5. Associated Wholesale Grocers, Inc. v. Americold Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. Lincoln v. BNSF Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. Stechschulte v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
  3. Wolfe Electric, Inc. v. DuckworthSupreme Court of Kansas · 2011
  4. Marshall v. Kansas Medical Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2003
  5. Penncro Associates, Inc. v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API