Legal Opinion

United States v. Anderson

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided September 22, 1980No. CM 438989PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

O’DONNELL, Judge:

The appellant was charged with rape and attempted rape. As to the former, he was convicted of carnal knowledge in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920. As to the latter, he was convicted of wrongfully committing an indecent, lewd and lascivious act with another in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934.1 His sentence to bad-conduct discharge and confinement at hard labor for one year was approved by the convening authority.

The appellant contends that under the circumstances the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. BerryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  2. United States v. HobbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1957
  3. United States v. SanchezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1960
  4. United States v. ThackerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1966

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. WoodardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1986
  2. United States v. Murray-CottoU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  3. United States v. CheathamU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1984
  4. United States v. JacksonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
  5. United States v. KingU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API