Legal Opinion

United States v. Jackson

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided June 28, 1990No. ACM 28413PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

KASTL, Senior Judge:

Two intriguing issues face us today. We find merit as to the first and reassess the sentence.

Indecent Act v. Indecent Exposure

Airman First Class Jackson was charged with an indecent act with SF by willfully exposing his penis in her presence at the base library. This was a violation of Article 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. § 934. He pleaded guilty and was sentenced by a general court-martial consisting of members.

On appeal, Jackson argues that his plea was improvident. He says his real offense was indecent exposure — not an indecent act. Both violate Article 134, UCMJ.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. SalesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. PeoplesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
  3. United States v. BrownUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953
  4. United States v. CalhounUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1955
  5. United States v. ParkerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1953

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. HansenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. DayeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. EberleUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API