United States v. Murray-Cotto
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON REMAND
2Per curiam
Appellant was convicted by a general court-martial composed of officer members of, inter alia, indecent acts with a female. The convening authority approved appellant’s sentence to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for twenty-four months, and forfeiture of $275.00 pay per month for twenty-four months. This court affirmed the findings and the sentence. The case is before the court on remand by the United States Court of Military Appeals, 25 M.J. 434, for further review of appellant’s conviction of indecent acts in light of United States v. Thomas, 25 M.J. 75…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. HollandUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1961
- United States v. ThomasUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
- United States v. RamirezUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. AndersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
4Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. HansenU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1992
- United States v. DayeU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1993
- United States v. JacksonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1990
- United States v. EberleUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.