Legal Opinion

United States v. King

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided December 12, 1989No. ACMR 8800746PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

GILLEY, Judge:

A general court-martial consisting of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant of “wrongfully commit[ting] an indecent act with Private E1 [L] by engaging in group sex with members of lower grades” in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The appellant was tried on specifications that he did “rape on or about 8 November 1987 Private E1 [L]” and commit sodomy with her “by force and without [her] consent,” in violation of Articles 120 and 125, UCMJ 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, respectively.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. HicksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. AmbaladaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
  4. United States v. AndersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
  5. United States v. BrundidgeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. BlakeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API