United States v. King
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
GILLEY, Judge:
A general court-martial consisting of officer and enlisted members convicted the appellant of “wrongfully commit[ting] an indecent act with Private E1 [L] by engaging in group sex with members of lower grades” in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The appellant was tried on specifications that he did “rape on or about 8 November 1987 Private E1 [L]” and commit sodomy with her “by force and without [her] consent,” in violation of Articles 120 and 125, UCMJ 10 U.S.C. §§ 920, 925, respectively.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. BakerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
- United States v. HicksonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. AmbaladaU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. AndersonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1980
- United States v. BrundidgeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. BlakeU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1991