Pratt v. Hopper
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WHITE, J., pro tem.
This is an appeal by the plaintiff from a judgment entered against her in an action brought to recover a deficiency on a note secured by trust- deed aftpr the security was sold. This appeal involves only the defendants H. C. Hopper and Raleigh P. Trimble. As far as the defendants F. W. Payne and Mitchell Mayer are concerned, they are not involved in this appeal, the record indicating that defendant Payne has not been served with summons and that defendant Mitchell Mayer, also known as M. Numier, was served, failed to appear or plead in the action, and a default ¡judgment…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Falk v. MoebsSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Craig v. BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Utah State National Bank v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
- Charles Nelson Co. v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Case v. EganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Clifton Cattle Co. v. ThompsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Lady v. ThomasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Schwaegler Co. v. MarchesottiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Plains State Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1953