Legal Opinion
James Dixon, Jr. v. Alberto Gonzales, United States Attorney General and Robert S. Mueller, Iii, Fbi Director
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided March 14, 2007No. 05-2216PublishedCited by 229 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ALGENON L. MARBLEY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff-Appellant James Dixon, Jr. (“Dixon”) appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Defendant-Appellee Alberto Gonzales, sued in his official capacity as Attorney General of the United States and Defendant-Appellee Robert S. Mueller, III, sued in his official capacity as the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (“FBI”) (collectively, the “Attorney General”). Dixon alleges that he was denied reinstatement as a Special Agent with the FBI as a result of unlawful retaliation by a former supervisor,…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Clark County School District v. BreedenSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by229 opinions
- Mark Laster v. City of KalamazooCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
- Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Seeger v. Cincinnati Bell Telephone Co., LLCCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Community Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Michael v. Caterpillar Financial Services Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
224 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.