Legal Opinion

United States v. Langley

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided September 26, 1991No. 64,834; CM 8801826PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*279 Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, a general court-martial with officer and enlisted members convicted appellant of assault with intent to commit rape, as charged, in violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 934. The court-martial sentenced appellant to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement for 5 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to the lowest enlisted grade. The convening authority approved these results. In turn, the Court of Military Review reduced the confinement to 3 years but in all other respects affirmed. 29 MJ 1015, 1017…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. ManceUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  4. United States v. TaylorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1988
  5. United States v. RowanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1998
  2. United States v. WillisCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  3. United States v. AnzaloneCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
  4. United States v. SellersUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  5. United States v. ShepardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API