Commercial Bank of Madera v. Redfield
California Supreme Court
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Madera County and from an order denying a new trial. W. M. Conley, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
CHIPMAN, C.
Foreclosure of mortgage on real property. It appears from the findings that the promissory note and mortgage, the subject of the action, were made by defendants O. T. and Phebe Redfield to defendant Roberts, and by Roberts was assigned to plaintiff before the maturity of the note, with written guaranty of payment at maturity indorsed thereon. Included in the mortgage with other lots was lot 14, block 60, town of Madera. ¡November 11, 1893, the Redfields (mortgagors) sold this lot to defendant Lazar Popovich, who promised the Red-fields that he would pay the note and mortgage. June…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Smith v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
- Gill v. DriverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by16 opinions
- Falk v. FalkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Forsythe v. Los Angeles Ry. Co.California Supreme Court · 1906
- Tiffany & Co. v. SpreckelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- People v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.