Legal Opinion

Tiffany & Co. v. Spreckels

California Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 11791PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

Action brought to recover upon a claim against the estate of John D. Spreckels, Jr., deceased. The claim was based upon an agreement whereby, it is contended, the deceased guaranteed the payment to appellant of the sum of £16,500, lawful money of the kingdom of Great Britain (equal to $80,350 in lawful money of the United States), being the cost price of a pearl necklace purchased of appellant by the wife of the deceased. It is undisputed that Mrs. Spreckels on or about the third day of June, 1920, purchased from Tiffany & Company at London, England, a pearl necklace, and agreed to pay…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. BeggsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Morrill v. NightingaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Sargent v. SargentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Black v. BlackCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Whelan v. SwainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Puckett v. PuckettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Simmons v. California Institute of TechnologyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bard v. KentCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Frasier v. CarterIdaho Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Wine Packing Corp. of Cal. v. VossCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API