Gill v. Driver
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Mendocino County. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Belcher, C.
— This is an action to recover the possession of certain personal property, or its value, alleged to be one thousand dollars, and damages for its detention. The complaint is in the usual form in such cases.
The defendants, by their answer, deny all the averments of the complaint, and allege that at the time of the commencement of the action, and at all times since, they were and have been the owners and entitled to the possession of the property described in the complaint; that the value of the property was one thousand dollars; and while the defendants were the owners and entitled…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Pico v. CuyasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1873
- Smith v. AckerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
3Cited by18 opinions
- Gossman v. GossmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
- Perry v. QuackenbushCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Kompf v. MorrisonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Blood Relatives of Hill v. Blood Relatives of HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- People v. McCueCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.