Legal Opinion

Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 23, 1978No. Appeals, Nos. 1346, 1457, 1472 and 1485 C.D. 1977PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

This passionately contested electric utility rate case began on October 1, 1976 when Duquesne Light Company filed with the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (PUC) its Supplement No. 2 to Tariff Electric Pa. P.U.C. No. 14, proposing an annual revenue increase of $127,897,362, issued to become effective November 30, 1976. On the same day Duquesne filed a “Petition for Emergency Rate Relief” requesting, that $87,273,696 of its requested revenue increase be allowed to become effective on November 30, 1976 or as soon thereafter as possible.1

On December 17, 1976 the PUC…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Reed v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  3. Commonwealth v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  5. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Carbonaire Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Widoff v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. City of Pittsburgh v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Joseph Horne Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API