Legal Opinion

Widoff v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1979No. Appeal, No. 2277 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge DiSalle,

The present controversy derives from the April 28, 1978 filing by the Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company (PG&W), of tariff supplements proposing a $5,-551,536.00 increase in its annual water revenues. On May 23, 1978, the Public Utility Commission (PUC) ordered that the proposed increase be suspended and that an investigation be conducted before an administrative law judge to determine the reasonableness and lawfulness of the increase.

The Consumer Advocate (CA) objected to the proposed increase. By order of the administrative law judge, the CA’s complaint was…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Duquesne Light Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Allegheny Ludlum Steel Corp. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Robertshaw Controls Co. v. Commonwealth, Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Brink's Inc. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  4. Joseph Horne Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API