Legal Opinion
Christopher v. Windom Area School Board
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 27, 2010No. A09-1715PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLAPHAKE, Judge.
This appeal involves a challenge to a school board’s decision not to renew an annual basketball coaching contract of a high school teacher. We affirm.
FACTS
During the 2008-09 school year, relator Corey Christopher was a part-time English teacher, activities director, and boys varsity basketball coach at the Windom Area School (Windom). As a teacher, relator taught one English class and supervised one study hall. Relator’s teaching position was subject to a continuing contract, but his other assignments were subject to a one-year contract for which he received separate…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2003
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Application of MinnegascoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. NessCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
- McGuire v. Independent School District No. 833Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- McGuire v. Independent School District No. 833District Court, D. Minnesota · 2015
- DRB 24, LLC, on behalf of itself and other similarly situated property owners in Minneapolis that have been assessed vacant building registration fees in 2013 v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- Francisco Vincent Vargas v. State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.