Legal Opinion
Denelsbeck v. Wells Fargo & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided July 31, 2003No. C8-02-594PublishedCited by 88 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, PAUL H., Justice.
Respondent Violet Denelsbeck brought this breach of contract action against appellant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., alleging that Wells Fargo breached the terms of her retirement certificate of deposit. De-nelsbeck contends that Wells Fargo failed to give her adequate notice that it was changing the 12.25% interest rate paid on her certificate to 4.6%. Concluding that Wells Fargo had provided adequate notice, the district court granted summary judgment to Wells Fargo. The court of appeals reversed the grant of summary judgment, concluding that “genuine issues of…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Offerdahl v. University of Minnesota Hospitals & ClinicsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
- Turner v. Alpha Phi Sorority HouseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Contested Cases of St. Otto's Home v. Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Art Goebel, Inc. v. North Suburban Agencies, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Ruud v. Great Plains Supply, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Matthew Carlsen v. GameStop, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Illinois Farmers Insurance Co. v. Glass Service Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Vlahos v. R&I Construction of Bloomington, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
- Staffing Specifix, Inc. v. Tempworks Mgmt. Servs., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Smith v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.California Court of Appeal · 2006
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.