Legal Opinion
Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. Krueger
District Court, D. Montana
Decided June 25, 2013No. CV 12-55-M-DLCPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
The plaintiffs challenge two projects in the Gallatin National Forest — the Bozeman Municipal Watershed Project and the East Boulder Project. The Forest Service authorized the Bozeman Project on March 5, 2012. It involves logging and burning on several thousand acres over a 5-12 year time frame. The Service will need to construct 7 new miles of road and reopen 3 miles. The Service authorized the East Boulder Project on October 26, 2011. It will involve 650 acres of logging and 2 miles of temporary road construction. Some project activities are slated to take…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Amoco Production Co. v. Village of GambellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Friends of the Wild Swan v. WeberDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2013
- Alliance for the Wild Rockies v. WeberDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2013
- Los Padres Forestwatch v. UsfsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
- Red Wolf Coalition v. United States Fish & Wildlife ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2016
- Alliance for Wild Rockies v. KrugerDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.