Legal Opinion

Cantonwine v. Fehling

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1978No. 4848, 4849PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

These appeals arise from a suit initiated by Winnibel Fehling (hereinafter the plaintiff) to collect $15,000.00 she claimed was due on certain promissory notes executed by Carl H. and Juanita M. Cantonwine (hereinafter the defendants) to the plaintiff and her husband. The trial court entered a summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff with respect to one-half of her claim, and a summary judgment in favor of the defendants with respect to the remainder of the claim. In addition, the trial court denied defendants’ motion to dismiss, finding that the Wyoming—and not the…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Veeder v. . BakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Bruner v. MartinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1907
  3. Keller v. AndersonWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Seay v. VialpandoWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Hunter v. Farmers Insurance GroupWyoming Supreme Court · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Duke v. HousenWyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Schepps v. HoweWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Borns Ex Rel. Gannon v. VossWyoming Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Wyoming Insurance Department v. Sierra Life Insurance Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  5. In Re AnselmiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Wyoming · 1985

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API