Legal Opinion

Hunter v. Farmers Insurance Group

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1976No. 4591PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAPER, Justice.

The defendant-appellee insurance company moved for summary judgment in the district court, claiming that as a matter of law the defendant insurance company is free of liability for medical expenses related to a covered automobile accident and person, which did not. become payable until more than one year from the date of the occurrence under the following medical expense policy obligation:

“To pay all reasonable expenses actually incurred within one year from the date of accident for necessary medical services.”

From a ruling favorable to the defendant insurance company, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Bluejacket v. CarneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Lavelle Stevens, Administratrix of the Estate of Robert Wayne Stevens, Deceased v. James A. Barnard, Iii, D/B/A Mid-Continent BellancaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1975
  3. Knudson v. HilzerWyoming Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Fred PetschCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1958
  5. Clouser v. Spaniol Ford, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Darner Motor Sales, Inc. v. Universal Underwriters InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Potesta v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Weaver v. Blue Cross-Blue ShieldWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Metz Beverage Co. v. Wyoming Beverages, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Timmons v. ReedWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API