Legal Opinion

Seay v. Vialpando

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1977No. 4738PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Justice.

Donald and Ingrid Seay brought suit against Augustin Vialpando and Ralph Anderson in connection with the design of a home, which Anderson had built for appellants. Appellants sought actual and punitive damages for a violation of their common-law copyright in certain architectural blueprints. In the alternative, appellants sought damages for conversion of the blueprints, and stated a further cause of action seeking quantum meruit recovery. Appel-lees filed separate motions for summary judgment, and appellants filed a cross-motion for summary judgment. Appellees’ motions were…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Johnson v. SoulisWyoming Supreme Court · 1975
  2. American Tobacco Co. v. WerckmeisterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  3. National Comics Publications, Inc. v. Fawcett Publications, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
  4. Stanley v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Werckmeister v. American Lithographic Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. O'DONNELL v. City of CasperWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Meuse-Rhine-Ijssel Cattle Breeders of Canada Ltd. v. Y-Tex Corp.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Timmons v. ReedWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Laird v. LairdWyoming Supreme Court · 1979

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API