Legal Opinion

City of De Pere v. Public Service Commission

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1954PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, C. J.

Respondent, city of De Pere, assumes that the charge in question of $1.25 a front foot imposed, in addition to a tapping charge, upon all property owners desiring to make new connections to a main for which they have not paid or for which they have not paid a special assessment, is a tax or an assessment. “Taxes,” it was said in Fitch v. Wisconsin Tax Comm. 201 Wis. 383, 387, 230 N. W. 37, “are the enforced proportional contributions from persons and property, levied by the state by virtue of its sovereignty for the support of government and for all public needs. The state demands and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Packet Co. v. KeokukSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Piper v. City of MadisowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Stewart v. Verde River Irrigation & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Pabst Corp. v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Fitch v. Wisconsin Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. City of Plymouth v. ElsnerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  2. City of Milwaukee v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Oneida Tribe of Indians v. Village of HobartDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2008
  4. City of River Falls v. St. Bridget's Catholic ChurchCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. TIMBER RIDGE ASSOC. BY LERNER v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API