Legal Opinion
TIMBER RIDGE ASSOC. BY LERNER v. City of Hartford
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided January 10, 1984No. Civ. A. 83-C-7PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION and ORDER
TERENCE T. EVANS, District Judge.
The plaintiffs, Timber Ridge Associates, a limited partnership and its two general partners, claim that they have been forced by the City of Hartford to pay for municipal services they did not receive. They brought this § 1983 action to obtain a refund and to prevent Hartford from extracting similar payments from them in the future.
Timber Ridge owns several apartment properties in Hartford. Hartford owns and operates an electric utility for the benefit of the municipality. The utility supplies electricity to apartment buildings, including…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Fair Assessment in Real Estate Assn., Inc. v. McNarySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Moe v. Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. HuffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Rosewell v. LaSalle National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Matthews v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Levine v. Supreme Court of WisconsinDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 1988
- Trading Co. of North America, Inc. v. Bristol Township AuthorityDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1999