Legal Opinion

State v. Anderson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 26, 1966No. Cr. 3379PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

The defendant was charged in a complaint filed in the District Court for Umatilla County with a violation of the Oregon nuisance statute, OBS 161.310. He was convicted in the district court, appealed to the circuit court, where he was again convicted, and has appealed to this court.

As we view the case, the only question that need be considered is whether the facts stated in the complaint constitute a crime. No demurrer was filed, but the objection was raised by motion in arrest of judgment. Upon such a motion the court is authorized to consider the sufficiency of the complaint: OBS 136.810;…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. State of Oregon v. BuckOregon Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Multnomah County Fair Ass'n v. LangleyOregon Supreme Court · 1932
  4. State v. NeaseOregon Supreme Court · 1905
  5. State v. WaymireOregon Supreme Court · 1908

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. JimCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  2. Mejak v. GranvilleArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  3. State v. CutshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. State v. ShadleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1973
  5. State v. FranzoneOregon Supreme Court · 1966

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API