State v. Franzone
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.
The defendant was indicted for violation of ORS 161.310, generally known as the nuisance statute. ①
Defendant demurred to the indictment on various grounds and the demurrer was overruled. The parties thereafter entered into a so-called stipulation of facts, which, however, consists only of a repetition of the allegations of the indictment. Trial was had on such stipulation before the court without a jury and the court entered a judgment of conviction from which the defendant appeals.
The indictment alleges:
“FRANK FRANZONE is accused by the Grand Jury of the County of Multnomah and State of…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Ashton v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State of Oregon v. DeweyOregon Supreme Court · 1956
- State v. NeaseOregon Supreme Court · 1905
- State v. WaymireOregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Price v. StipekMontana Supreme Court · 1909
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. HafnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. HouseOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Pyle v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977
- Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of Fleetwood v. RhayCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
- Buffalo v. BuffaloNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.