Legal Opinion

Hunt Et Vir. v. Mestrezat

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 24, 1949No. Appeal, 75PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Allen M. Stearne,

The question raised by this appeal is whether a co-owner of real estate, and his wife, acquire, as tenants by the entireties a fee simple title to real estate by a deed, from the County Commissioners in a tax sale, or whether such title is held by the husband and wife in trust for all co-owners.

Mary E. Hunt and her husband, Edward K. Hunt (appellants), petitioned the common pleas court of Fayette County for a citation against Mary M. Mestrezat (appellee) to recover possession of real estate under the Act of April 20, 1905, P. L. 239, as amended, 12 PS,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gallagher EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Moeller v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Briegel v. BriegelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Raker v. G. C. Murphy Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Milan v. GrahamSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Brenner v. SukenikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Lund v. HeinrichSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  3. Wallaesa v. WallaesaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. DeBernard v. DeBernardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Collins v. WilkinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API