Legal Opinion

Briegel v. Briegel

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1931No. Appeal, 197PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

The City of Pittsburgh, in the exercise of the right of eminent domain, condemned land of Anthony Briegel, for which he was awarded $10,500. Briegel was married when the condemnation took place. His wife brought this bill against the city and her husband to have a portion of this fund set apart for her by virtue of her interest in lieu of her dower expectancy in the property. The award has been paid to a trustee pending the proceeding. Her husband denies her right to any part of the award, and the court below sustained his contention. The sole question before us…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Haggerty v. WagnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Nichols v. NicholsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1884
  3. Holmes v. WinchesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1882
  4. Greiner v. KleinMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  5. Kaufmann v. PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re De Facto Condemnation & Taking of Lands of WBF AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Hunt Et Vir. v. MestrezatSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Crystian (In Re Crystian)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Beers v. PuseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API