Legal Opinion

Milan v. Graham

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided May 26, 1932PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnes, J.

On exceptions by defendant this case comes up to determine whether the maker of a negotiable promissory note is held to pay it according to its terms.

It was a four months’ note, given by defendant, the maker, to J. R. Mulvaney, Inc., a seller of automobiles.

*221On the day of its making, or immediately thereafter, the note was endorsed by plaintiff and discounted at a bank. After its maturity plaintiff brought suit and at trial produced the note.

Defense pleaded is failure of consideration, in whole or in part, and that plaintiff was not a holder in due course.

The hearing was before the Court,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dugan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1818

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re De Facto Condemnation & Taking of Lands of WBF AssociatesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  2. Hunt Et Vir. v. MestrezatSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Mellon Bank, N.A. v. Crystian (In Re Crystian)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
  4. Beers v. PuseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  5. Smith v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API