Legal Opinion

Brenner v. Sukenik

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 19, 1963No. Appeal, 313PublishedCited by 59 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Eagen,

This action in equity was instituted by the wife against her husband for support and maintenance under the Act of May 23, 1907, P. L. 227, as amended, 48 P.S. §§131, 132. The nature of the action was both in personam and in rem. In addition to an award for support, the complaint requested the seizure of the husband’s real estate, individually held, and also asked the termination of an account in a savings and loan association registered in both names and allegedly owned as tenants by the entireties. In connection with the last mentioned property, the wife requested…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Madden v. Glosztonyi Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  2. Fisher v. BrickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  3. Sterrett v. SterrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  4. Sears v. Scranton Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  5. Fiore v. FioreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by59 opinions

  1. T. C. R. Realty, Inc. v. CoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  2. Robert F. Felte, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Shapiro v. ShapiroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  4. DiFlorido v. DiFloridoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  5. Man O' War Racing Ass'n v. State Horse Racing CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API