Soto v. Scaringelli
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
New Jersey’s compulsory automobile insurance statutory scheme distinguishes between those who seek recovery for economic loss — “uncompensated loss of income or property, or other uncompensated expenses, including, but not limited to, medical expenses[,]’’ N.J.S.A. 39:6A-2k — and those who seek recovery for nonecomonic loss — that is, loss for “pain, suffering and inconvenience[,]” N.J. S.A. 39:6A-2i. The noneconomic loss category of cases is further defined. If the verbal threshold 1 or limitation on lawsuit option applies, an injured person may not maintain a lawsuit for noneeomonie damages…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Brill v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Oswin v. ShawSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
- Gilhooley v. County of UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
- Van Horn v. William Blanchard Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Daidone v. Buterick BulkheadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Nini v. Mercer County Community CollegeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- In Re the Liquidation of Integrity InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- JEN ELECTRIC, INC. v. County of EssexSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Sciarrotta v. Global SpectrumSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.