Legal Opinion
Nini v. Mercer County Community College
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided June 1, 2010No. A-13/14 September Term 2009PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Long
In 2004, after working for Mercer County Community College for twenty-six years as a contract employee, Rose Nini was advised that her contract that was set to expire in 2005 would not be renewed. At the time Nini was over seventy years of age. She then filed a complaint against several College-related defendants (collectively the College) alleging, among other claims, age discrimination.
The trial judge granted the College’s motion for summary judgment, on the basis that the New Jersey Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-12(a), permits employers to “refus[e] to accept for…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- State v. Scott Robertson(075326)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2017
- Robert Smith v. Millville Rescue Squad(074685)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2016
- Quinlan v. Curtiss-Wright Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- Alexander v. Seton Hall UniversitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
- JOHN SMITH VS. ARVIND R. DATLA, M.D.(L-1527-15, MERCER COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.