Legal Opinion

Sciarrotta v. Global Spectrum

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided April 10, 2008PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto

The limited duty rule is unique. It applies to sports venues in respect of a specific peril, that of objects leaving the field of play that may injure spectators in the stands. It provides *348that a sports venue owner or operator that provides screened seating (1) “ ‘sufficient for those spectators who may be reasonably anticipated to desire protected seats on an ordinary occasion[,]’ ” and (2) “‘in the most dangerous section’ of the stands,” has satisfied its duty of care to those spectators. Schneider v. Am. Hockey & Ice Skating Ctr., Inc., 342 N.J.Super. 527, 533-34, 777 A.2d 380 (App.Div.)…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Akins v. Glens Falls City School DistrictNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  4. Gantes v. Kason Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
  5. Daidone v. Buterick BulkheadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Nini v. Mercer County Community CollegeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2010
  2. Estate of Desir v. VertusSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2013
  3. EDWARD C. v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2010
  4. JEFFREY SAUTER VS. COLTS NECK VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANYNO. 2 (L-2637-13, MONMOUTH COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2017
  5. Shirley Martinez and Richard Martinez v. Houston McLane Company, LLC D/B/A Houston Astros Baseball Club, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API