Legal Opinion
JEN ELECTRIC, INC. v. County of Essex
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 4, 2009No. A-23 September Term 2008PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rivera-Soto
This appeal arises in the context of a bid specification challenge, a subset of public contracting. The primary issue presented is whether the provisions of the 2000 amendment to N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13 limit the standing of those who wish to challenge a bid specification in a public contract, or whether those provisions represent a limitations period within which such a challenge by an identified party — a “prospective bidder” — must perfect that challenge. The trial court determined that N.J.S.A. 40A:11-13 sets forth the standing requirements for those who wish to challenge a bid specification…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- George Harms Construction Co. v. New Jersey Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
- Crescent Park Tenants Ass'n v. Realty Equities Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Daidone v. Buterick BulkheadingSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2007
- Meadowbrook Carting Co. v. Borough of Island HeightsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Lansing Schools Education Ass'n v. Lansing Board of EducationMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Bondi v. Citigroup, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
- Garden State Equality v. DowNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2013
- COURIER-POST v. County of CamdenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- In Re New Jersey State ContractNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2011
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.