Thomas Manufacturing Co. v. Knapp
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for Le Sueur County, Morrison, J., denying a motion for a new trial, after a trial without a jury and the entry of an order dismissing the case.
1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.
In an action on a promissory note the defendant interposed the defense that the plaintiff, a foreign corporation, had not complied with chapters 69, 70, pp. 68, 71, Laws 1899. The trial court ordered judgment in favor of the defendant, and the plaintiff appealed from an order denying its motion for a new trial. The appellant, under proper assignments of error, contends that the order of the trial court should be reversed, because it was not doing business within the state, and that the transaction in question constituted interstate commerce.
The evidence sustains the finding “that said…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Diamond Glue Co. v. United States Glue Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Cincinnati Mutual Health Assurance Co. v. RosenthalIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
- First Division of the St. Paul & Pacific Rail Road v. ParcherSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1869
- United States Express Co. v. LucasIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- G. Heileman Brewing Co. v. PeimeislSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1901
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Dunlop v. MercerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Drewek v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1932
- Hirschfeld v. McCullaghOregon Supreme Court · 1912
- Memphis & Arkansas River Packet Co. v. AgnewTennessee Supreme Court · 1915
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.