Clayton v. Wilkins
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Defendants appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction enjoining occupancy of certain lots of land by non-Caucasians.
Upon the authority of Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), 334 U.S. 1 [68 S.Ct. 836, 92 L.Ed. -] (see also Hurd v. Hodge (1948), 334 U.S. 24 [68 S.Ct. 847, 92 L.Ed. -]), holding that such restrictions cannot be enforced through court action, the order of the trial court granting the preliminary injunction must be reversed. (See also Cumings v. Hokr (1948), 31 Cal.2d 844 [193 P.2d 742]; Cassell v. Hickerson (1948), 31 Cal.2d 869 [193 P.2d 743]; Davis v. Carter (1948),…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Trautman v. HokrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- In re LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Cassell v. HickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barrows v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Morin v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Cavett v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- Coleman v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Cavett v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.