Legal Opinion

Clayton v. Wilkins

California Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1948No. L. A. No. 20399PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Defendants appeal from an order granting a preliminary injunction enjoining occupancy of certain lots of land by non-Caucasians.

Upon the authority of Shelley v. Kraemer (1948), 334 U.S. 1 [68 S.Ct. 836, 92 L.Ed. -] (see also Hurd v. Hodge (1948), 334 U.S. 24 [68 S.Ct. 847, 92 L.Ed. -]), holding that such restrictions cannot be enforced through court action, the order of the trial court granting the preliminary injunction must be reversed. (See also Cumings v. Hokr (1948), 31 Cal.2d 844 [193 P.2d 742]; Cassell v. Hickerson (1948), 31 Cal.2d 869 [193 P.2d 743]; Davis v. Carter (1948),…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Hurd v. HodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Trautman v. HokrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. In re LawsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Cassell v. HickersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barrows v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. Morin v. CraneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Cavett v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Coleman v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Cavett v. ButlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API